Facts:

• Dandi Salt Pvt. Ltd. was the Petitioner who filed an objection against the application for registration of copyright filed by Respondent no.2.
• Union of India & Respondent no.2 was the party whose application for copyright registration was objected to by the Petitioner.
• The Petitioner filed an objection against Respondent no.2's application for copyright registration.
• The objection was rejected by the Registrar of Copyrights.
• The Petitioner appealed to the Copyright Board, but the appeal was dismissed as it was filed beyond the prescribed three-month period.
• The Petitioner then sought a review of the dismissal before the Copyright Board, which was initially rejected by the Deputy Registrar of Copyrights.
• The Petitioner subsequently applied for a review to be placed before the Copyright Board, but this was also rejected by the Deputy Registrar, affirming the previous decision.
  

Main Issue:

Does the Registrar of Copyright have the jurisdiction to reject a review application filed by the Copyright Board?